In April 2012, we retrieved 27,500 articles from 1,260 sources.
We now store 887,110 articles. (Details)
It is indeed a paradox, an anachronistic piece of art that really got me thinking. Make no mistakes, the painting itself is beautiful. With precise oil paint brushstrokes, the piece, entitled “A Landmark in History” depicts the opening of the first session of the first parliament of Southern Rhodesia in 1924, with the pomp and ceremony (and even the Union Jack) that the motherland, England, would surely have been proud of.
And of course, not a single black face is seen amid the sea of attentive faces. White women, yes - but not a glimpse of a ‘native’. Probably, the only black people allowed into parliament back then were the tea boys and others tasked with menial chores.
All the same, the painting is beautiful and I am sure, an accurate depiction of events.
But, I also mentioned that it is paradoxical.
I didn’t happen upon this painting hanging in some historical museum or art gallery. In fact, the portrait has its place on one of the walls in the hallways of present day Zimbabwe’s parliament - a parliament made up of many politicians who would, if they could, wipe out any trace of European history within Zimbabwe.
I am sure that I need not[...]
[Published in NonProfitBlogs - Read the original article]




